<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: India Launches Third Arihant-Class Nuclear-Powered Submarine	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://imrmedia.in/india-launches-third-arihant-class-nuclear-powered-submarine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://imrmedia.in/india-launches-third-arihant-class-nuclear-powered-submarine/</link>
	<description>Indian Military Review, Defense News, Indian Defence Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Maj Gen S K Razdan Print Subs No 6188		</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/india-launches-third-arihant-class-nuclear-powered-submarine/#comment-269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maj Gen S K Razdan Print Subs No 6188]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=12052#comment-269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[S4 power rating seems to be reported lesser than the actual by a layman&#039;s logic:-
1.VLS doubled. Minimum 18 tons added.
2. Length increased by 14 m. It is longer than the Akula 190 MW reactor.
3. New propulsion system.
4. HY 80 cat steel being mfr at SAIL plant.
In my guestimation the reactor should be between150 to 190MW and not 82.5 MW to derive meaningful Shaft Power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S4 power rating seems to be reported lesser than the actual by a layman&#8217;s logic:-<br />
1.VLS doubled. Minimum 18 tons added.<br />
2. Length increased by 14 m. It is longer than the Akula 190 MW reactor.<br />
3. New propulsion system.<br />
4. HY 80 cat steel being mfr at SAIL plant.<br />
In my guestimation the reactor should be between150 to 190MW and not 82.5 MW to derive meaningful Shaft Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Maj Gen S K Razdan Print Subs No 6188		</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/india-launches-third-arihant-class-nuclear-powered-submarine/#comment-268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maj Gen S K Razdan Print Subs No 6188]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=12052#comment-268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SE power rating seems to be reported lesser tha actual by a layman&#039;s logic:-
1.VLS doubled. Minimum 18 tons added.
2. Length increased by 14 m. It is longer than the Akula 190 MW reactor.
3. New propulsion system.
4. HY 80 cat steel being mfr at SAIL plant.
In my guestimation the reactor should be 150 to 190MW and not 82.5 MW to derive meaningful Shaft Power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SE power rating seems to be reported lesser tha actual by a layman&#8217;s logic:-<br />
1.VLS doubled. Minimum 18 tons added.<br />
2. Length increased by 14 m. It is longer than the Akula 190 MW reactor.<br />
3. New propulsion system.<br />
4. HY 80 cat steel being mfr at SAIL plant.<br />
In my guestimation the reactor should be 150 to 190MW and not 82.5 MW to derive meaningful Shaft Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
