<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Springs | IMR</title>
	<atom:link href="https://imrmedia.in/tag/hot-springs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://imrmedia.in/tag/hot-springs/</link>
	<description>Indian Military Review, Defense News, Indian Defence Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>China plans another highway in Aksai Chin</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/china-plans-another-highway-in-aksai-china/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/china-plans-another-highway-in-aksai-china/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aksai Chin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depsang plains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G219 highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G695 expressway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galwan Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line of actual control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tibet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xinjiang]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=13744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>China is planning to build another highway through Aksai Chin, running along the India border and connecting Xinjiang with Tibet, according to a newly released highway construction plan. The G695 national expressway will be only the second national highway through the disputed Aksai Chin region, where China controls 38,000 sq km of land claimed by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/china-plans-another-highway-in-aksai-china/">China plans another highway in Aksai Chin</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China is planning to build another highway through Aksai Chin, running along the India border and connecting Xinjiang with Tibet, according to a newly released highway construction plan.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The G695 national expressway will be only the second national highway through the disputed Aksai Chin region, where China controls 38,000 sq km of land claimed by India, since the controversial construction of the G219 highway in the 1950s, and is expected to be completed by 2035.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new highway, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported on Wednesday, will run even closer to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) than G219 and is likely to broadly run along the course of G219 from Mazha in Xinjiang in the north, through Aksai Chin, which is currently administered under the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, heading south along the borders with India, Nepal and Bhutan, and down to Lhunze in southeastern Tibet right across the border from Arunachal Pradesh.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While a map of the proposed highway has not been released, the route described by the report will mean the highway will likely cut across Aksai Chin. Its course will bring it close to several disputed areas that have seen recent tensions, the Post reported, from Eastern Ladakh down to near Doklam close to the India-China-Bhutan trijunction. “Details of the new construction remain unclear, but the highway, when completed, may also go near hotly contested areas such as the Depsang Plains, Galwan Valley and Hot Springs on the LAC,” the report said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The plan for G695 follows long-held discussions to build another border highway to supplement G219 and act as another key artery that could help China mobilise resources rapidly towards border areas. China has also stepped up the construction of secondary highways at the provincial level that will connect the national highways to remote border areas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This week, Beijing unveiled a new national road network plan that aims to build 4,61,000 km of roads — including 1,62,000 km of national expressways and 2,99,000 km of provincial highways — by 2035. Under the plan, the official China News Service reported, all cities with a 1 lakh population will be connected to a national highway in 30 minutes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/china-plans-another-highway-in-aksai-china/">China plans another highway in Aksai Chin</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/china-plans-another-highway-in-aksai-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China building bridges over Pangong Tso</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/china-building-bridges-over-pangong-tso/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/china-building-bridges-over-pangong-tso/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbourhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge on Pangong Tso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chang Chenmo range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demchok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depsang Bulge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galwan Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gogra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurung Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kailash Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karakoram range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khurnak fort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line of actual control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maldo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moldo Garrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pangong Tso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peoples Liberation Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rezang la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sirijap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanggur Lake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=14119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Maj Gen Deepak Mehta On May 20, the ministry of external affairs confirmed reports about China building a second bridge across the lake. The MEA statement said the bridge was being built in territory illegally occupied by China. It is coming up near the ruins of the Khurnak fort, built in 1867 by the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/china-building-bridges-over-pangong-tso/">China building bridges over Pangong Tso</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Maj Gen Deepak Mehta</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On May 20, the ministry of external affairs confirmed reports about China building a second bridge across the lake. The MEA statement said the bridge was being built in territory illegally occupied by China. It is coming up near the ruins of the Khurnak fort, built in 1867 by the Changpa tribes of Tibet, on the north bank of the lake. Till 1958, the fort and the premises marked the Sino-Indian border where the Indian Army had an observation post. The Chinese overran the area in 1958 and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) now runs nearly 20km west of Khurnak.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">India has been closely monitoring Chinese activity in Khurnak since January, but could not do much as the construction was happening within the territory under Chinese control. The first bridge, which was completed in April, is being used by the People&#8217;s Liberation Army (PLA) to transport construction equipment to build the second bridge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Latest satellite images show that the new bridge is bigger and wider—it is 450m long and 10m wide—and is meant for faster movement of not just troops and vehicles, but even tanks. It is expected to be ready by July. The bridge will cut the distance from Rudok—the PLA&#8217;s main base servicing its deployments in the Pangong area—to the LAC to about 50km, from the existing distance of over 200km.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-background">Background</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">India and China have been locked in the border row since April-May 2020, and despite disengagement of soldiers at Galwan Valley, Pangong Lake and Gogra, the two sides still have around 60,000 troops each and advanced weaponry deployed in the Ladakh theatre.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In May 2020, Indian and Chinese soldiers engaged in a brawl near Pangong Tso, causing serious injuries to both sides. A month later, a deadly clash in the Galwan valley resulted in the death of 20 Indian soldiers, including the commanding officer of 16 Bihar, Colonel Santosh Babu. It was the first time in nearly five decades that fatalities were reported on the LAC, and it triggered massive deployment of troops and heavy weapons by both armies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As of now, military disengagement has only taken place in Galwan Valley, Pangong Tso (both banks) and Gogra-Hot Springs area. The Indian army wants PLA to first restore April 2020 status quo ante in PPT 15 and then resolve the patrolling issues in Depsang Bulge&nbsp; (south of DBO sector) and the Charding Nulllah Junction in Demchok. Till the time these military objectives are achieved, New Delhi is in no mood to normalize ties with Beijing.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Importance of Pangong Tso</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pangong Tso is a 130-km-long lake, approximately one-third of which is in India and the remainder in China with width varying from one to five km is a major obstacle. The water body is of immense strategic importance as it offers suitable avenue for undertaking major operations. The People&#8217;s Liberation Army (PLA) occupied Khurnak Fort in 1958 and later in 1959 also established a camp at Maldo- Spanggur Lake area, South of Pangong Tso.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the 1962 war, Chinese offensive to clear Indian defensive localities on the Northern Bank was launched from Khurnak Fort garrison on October 22. The Chinese were able to capture Indian positions from Sirijap right up to Finger 2 in just two days. However, for progressing operations south of Pangong Tso, PLA had to take a tactical pause of more than three weeks as it had to circumvent the lake to concentrate forces at Rudok.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Second Bridge</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chinese are constructing another bridge over Pangong Tso; adjacent to the one built few months earlier in the Khurnak Fort area, barely 25 km east of the LAC. It is a double-span bridge, capable of ferrying heavier equipment like tanks and artillery guns. China&#8217;s overdrive to upgrade infrastructure, both military and civil, part of &#8216;dual use&#8217; policy, all along the LAC indicates its larger design with serious ramifications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In May 2020, PLA&#8217;s aggression in Pangong Tso area was confined to the northern side only. When the Indian Army occupied the Kailash Range South of Pangong Tso on the night of August 29-30, 2020 as counter to the Chinese actions, PLA was again handicapped due to the constraints of shifting troops from north to the south of Pangong Tso. To obviate this, China has now gone on to build twin bridges at the narrowest part of Pangong Tso, which cuts down the distance to Rudok by almost 150 km and movement time from 10 to barely 3 hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Satellite imagery shows the new bridge is being constructed parallel to the first bridge, which is narrower and was completed in April. The first bridge is being used to move equipment such as cranes needed to build the second one, which will be capable of accommodating larger and heavier vehicles such as tanks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both structures are located across the narrowest section of the 134-km-long lake. They will cut the distance between Chinese troop positions on the north bank to a key People&#8217;s Liberation Army (PLA) base at Rutog, on the eastern end of the lake, by around 150 km.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Kailash Range</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the intervening night of August 29 and 30, 2020, India took control of several key heights lying vacant since 1962, including Rezang La, Black Top, Helmet Top, Gurung Hill, Gorkha Hill and Maggar Hill of the Kailash range, overlooking China&#8217;s Moldo garrison.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The military assessment is that not only does the twin bridge cut the road loop to Rudog base but also allows for faster deployment were India to enact the August 29-21, 2020, action by suddenly occupying heights on the south banks of the lake. The Indian military action during that period not only took the PLA by surprise but also forced China to settle for military disengagement on both banks of the lake with the creation of buffer zones.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fingers on the Pangong Tso</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the strategic front, the confrontation between Indian and Chinese forces at Pangong Tso is largely on the eight spurs—called &#8216;Fingers&#8217; in military parlance—jutting out of the Chang Chenmo range, an eastern extension of the Karakoram Range which ends at the north bank of Pangong Tso. Traditionally, India exerted control up to Finger 4 and has claimed up to Finger 8 from where the Indian perception of the LAC starts. India has a permanent position near Finger 3 (named after Major Dhan Singh Thapa who was awarded Param Vir Chakra after the 1962 war), while China maintains a base east of Finger 8. But over the years, China steadily encroached upon Indian territory. Both sides have now reached an agreement giving India control up to Finger 4 and the rest to China.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Heavy Deployment</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both the armies are matched in deployment across the LAC with Chinese armour and rocket regiments stationed at Rudog base, south of Pangong Tso, and at Xiadullah in the restive Xinjiang military region. The PLA Air Force has stationed its fighters and bombers at Gar Gunsa across Demchok and at Hotan airbase in Xinjiang.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Indian Army is also fully deployed along the LAC with roads and bridges that can accommodate tanks or armoured personnel carriers all the way up to Daulet Beg Oldi and as many as seven bridges coming up on Galwan river to handle any military emergency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Until May 2020, Pangong Tso had only minimal military presence. Only one company each of the Army and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police were deployed in the area. Now, the entire lake is militarised. The PLA is converting its temporary ammunition dumps, helipads and surface-to-air missile positions into permanent ones. Its soldiers are equipped with howitzers, T-15 light tanks, and Type-81 assault rifles and PHL-03 multiple rocket launchers. The PLA has augmented its manpower by deploying two new divisions from the Xinjiang Military District, with elements of motorised infantry, armoured, artillery and anti-aircraft regiments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the Indian side, nearly 20,000 troops guard the region, armed with Bofors howitzers and BMP-2 infantry combat vehicles. Armoured columns of T-90 and T-72 tanks are stationed behind. Several news posts with additional deployment and bunkers have come up. A large number of additional battalions have been moved to Ladakh from the western sector. To patrol the lake, Indian Army&#8217;s new boats, capable of cruising at a speed of nearly 40kmph with around 20 soldiers, are deployed. Built by Goa Shipyard exclusively for the Army, these advanced boats can be modified to fit light weapons if needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ITBP, the force responsible for guarding the India-China border, too, has made significant enhancements. It has deployed close to 40 per cent additional troops in the area. New border outposts are being created along with infrastructure development of barracks and accommodations for better living conditions, while existing outposts are being further strengthened with additional men and machines.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another major problem confounding the security planners is that unlike most other hotspots along the LAC, Pangong Tso is also a popular tourist destination. Pangong Tso and its surroundings were opened up for visitors in the early 1990s, and it became famous after the climax of the 2008 Bollywood movie 3 Idiots, starring Aamir Khan, was filmed near the lake. Ironically, the movie was equally popular in China.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Comments</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the twin bridges in Khurnak Fort area are&nbsp; beyond the LAC perception of India and hence technically on territory that the PLA occupied in 1959,&nbsp; Chinese soldiers continue to be forwardly deployed on patrolling point 15, which is in Kugrang Heights and en-route the shortest path from Panging Tso to Galwan Valley.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China&#8217;s strategic intent is clear: it plans to keep the positions it recently captured in the Pangong area.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The only feasible response is to have reciprocal infrastructure development in areas controlled by India. For instance, despite strident Chinese opposition, India went ahead with building several bridges on the Shyok River and in Daulat Beg Oldi in the past couple of years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Indian side has conveyed its expectations regarding the military standoff on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) to the Chinese side, including foreign minister Wang Yi, and will continue to take the matter forward in order to find a solution though talks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/china-building-bridges-over-pangong-tso/">China building bridges over Pangong Tso</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/china-building-bridges-over-pangong-tso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>India-China 14th round military dialogue fails to move forward</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-14th-round-military-dialogue-fails-to-move-forward/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-14th-round-military-dialogue-fails-to-move-forward/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th round]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boundary talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chushul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corps Commander-level talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demchok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depsang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disengagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gogra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-China standoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-China talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line of actual control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moldo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=12096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 14th round of India-China Corps Commander-level military dialogue, on 12 January, failed to yield any positive outcomes but both countries decided to work towards mutually acceptable solutions to resolving the Ladakh LAC stand-off. The next round is expected to be held soon to continue the momentum of discussions. The talks took place at the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/india-china-14th-round-military-dialogue-fails-to-move-forward/">India-China 14th round military dialogue fails to move forward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The 14th round of India-China Corps Commander-level military dialogue, on 12 January, failed to yield any positive outcomes but both countries decided to work towards mutually acceptable solutions to resolving the Ladakh LAC stand-off. The next round is expected to be held soon to continue the momentum of discussions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The talks took place at the Chushul-Moldo meeting point, on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh. The meet concluded at 10.30 pm after 13 hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Major focus of the talks was on disengagement in the Hot Springs area. The Indian side was expected to press for disengagement as soon as possible in all the remaining friction points, including resolution of issues in Depsang Bulge and Demchok.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In pure diplomatic language, the talks were constructive without any positive outcome and reaching mutually acceptable solutions is work in progress. This means both the Indian Army and the PLA commanders will continue to engage in future but there is no guarantee on whether the PLA will restore April 2020 status quo ante in Gogra-Hot Springs or resolve the Depsang Bulge or CNJ issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fact is that the PLA with new border law and rapid military and technological upgradation on their side of the unresolved LAC is converting the 3,488 km line into Line of Control.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">MoD statement</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A statement issued by the Ministry of Defence on Thursday evening said representatives from the defence and foreign affairs establishments of the two sides were present at the meeting. “They agreed that both sides should follow the guidance provided by the state leaders and work for the resolution of the remaining issues at the earliest.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The statements issued by both sides were not as blunt and sharp as those issued after the 13th round of talks on October 10, 2021, when they blamed each other for the failure of the talks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This time, the statement said: “The two sides have agreed to stay in close contact and maintain dialogue via military and diplomatic channels and work out a mutually acceptable resolution of the remaining issues at the earliest.” It also spoke about agreeing to hold the next round of the commanders’ talks at the earliest. Since June 2020, there have been 14 rounds of talks. Though there has been partial success, troop build-up on either side, for now, shows no signs of getting back to the pre-April 2020 levels. At the talks yesterday, India and China agreed that the two sides would consolidate the “previous outcomes” and take effective efforts to maintain the security and stability on the ground in the western sector.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “previous outcomes” mentioned in the statement referred to the disengagement at PP-17, PP-17A, and north and south banks of the Pangong Tso, a 135-km glacial lake. India shares 832-km LAC with China in the eastern Ladakh sector.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-rise-in-tensions">Rise in Tensions</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the corps commander-level talks doing little to ease tensions, the confrontation could likely get worse at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, and that Beijing may not continue with the regular lines of communication.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While India didn’t expect movement on the disengagement plans, owing to China’s recent actions to deploy more troops at the LAC, the commentary from Beijing this time that India had made “unreasonable demands” has prompted strategic sources in New Delhi to believe that this could lead to a ‘Galwan-like’ flare-up.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The sticky issues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While disengagement has taken place in the Pangong Tso area and at the Gogra Post, a stand-off continues over Patrolling Point 15 (PP15) in Hot Springs, the Depsang Plains and in the Demchok area.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">India and China have six to seven hotlines but there has been little progress in the talks. A larger plan to resolve the issue with the establishment of a hotline at the DGMO level remains unfulfilled.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Indian side clearly failed to persuade the PLA towards disengagement from Gogra-Hot Springs near Kongka La as well as resolving patrolling rights issues in Depsang Bulge in Daulet Beg Oldi sector and Charding Nullah Junction in Demchok sector.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Indian Army apparently raised the issue of PLA building a bridge over Pangong Tso, east of Srijap Complex, for faster troop deployment and rapid militarisation of the occupied Aksai Chin area by the Chinese Army all along the 597-km Ladakh LAC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There would be no immediate disengagement of troops from Patrolling Point (PP)-15, also known as Hot Springs. Resultantly, Indian forces would stick to their locations and positions at the LAC. Weapons, equipment, tanks, artillery guns and other high technology surveillance systems would also be around. Both sides have some 75,000 troops in the sector.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">13th Round</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The 13th round of talks had taken place on October 10, 2021 and they ended in a stalemate. Both sides had failed to make any headway in the talks with the Indian Army saying after the dialogue that the “constructive suggestions” made by it were neither agreeable to the Chinese side nor it could provide any “forward-looking” proposals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In their virtual diplomatic talks on November 18, India and China agreed to hold the 14th round of military talks at an early date to achieve the objective of complete disengagement in remaining friction points in eastern Ladakh.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Continued Stand-off</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both the Indian and PLA armies are locked in a stand-off all along Ladakh LAC since the Chinese Army under instructions from the Central Military Commission under President Xi Jinping decided to unilaterally change the LAC and impose the rejected 1959 cartographical line on the Ladakh LAC in May 2020. Since then the two sides are fully deployed with more than three divisions of troops on each side with missile, rocket, artillery and tank regiments apart from the Air Force being on standby in the hinterland. The PLA by transgressing in Pangong Tso, Galwan, Gogra-Hot Springs area in May 2020 broke the bilateral 1993 and 1996 peace and tranquility agreements signed at the level of heads of states.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both sides gradually enhanced their deployment by rushing in tens of thousands of soldiers as well as heavy weaponry.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result of a series of military and diplomatic talks, the two sides completed the disengagement process last year in the north and south banks of the Pangong lake and in the Gogra area.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each side currently has around 50,000 to 60,000 troops along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the sensitive sector.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ever since the LAC stand-off began in April-May 2020, both sides have mainly followed a three-tier approach — regular talks at the diplomatic and military levels, along with a dialogue track between External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To top all of this, talks were also held between National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and top Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi. It was Doval and Yang who agreed to a disengagement plan in 2020.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This time the talks failed as the Chinese have replaced Gen. Xu Qiling, who was promoted in July, with Gen. Wang Haijiang, and that as a result a “comfort level” had not been achieved.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/india-china-14th-round-military-dialogue-fails-to-move-forward/">India-China 14th round military dialogue fails to move forward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-14th-round-military-dialogue-fails-to-move-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>India, China disengage at Gogra, Galwan and Hot Springs  &#8211; Indian Military Review</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-disengage-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-indian-military-review/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-disengage-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-indian-military-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galwan Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India China disengagement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=6137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Amid the ongoing border tension between India and China at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) since the last several weeks, sources on Wednesday asserted complete disengagement took place at Gogra, Galwan and Hot springs. China&#8217;s People&#8217;s Liberation Army (PLA) has moved from these places. The tension between the two sides at LAC escalated after [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/india-china-disengage-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-indian-military-review/">India, China disengage at Gogra, Galwan and Hot Springs  &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid the ongoing border tension between India and China at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) since the last several weeks, sources on Wednesday asserted complete disengagement took place at Gogra, Galwan and Hot springs. China&#8217;s People&#8217;s Liberation Army (PLA) has moved from these places.</p>
<p>The tension between the two sides at LAC escalated after the violent face-off between Indian and Chinese troops at Galwan Valley on the intervening night of June 15-16 that left 20 Indian soldiers dead. At least three rounds of Corps Commander talks were held between the two in an attempt to de-escalate tension in eastern Ladakh and finalise modalities for disengagement of troops from the sensitive region.</p>
<p>On July 6, the Chinese military withdrew its forces, including tents and vehicles by almost 1.5 km from three friction points — Galwan Valley, Gogra and Hot Spring sectors. Chinese&#8217;s PLA reportedly removed their tents and structures at Patrolling Point 14. Rearward movement of vehicles of the PLA was also removed at General area Galwan, Hotsprings and Gogra Post, official sources had added.</p>
<p>However, Army sources had on July 6 informed that Chinese heavy armoured vehicles were still present in the depth areas in the Galwan river area. &#8220;The Indian Army is monitoring the situation with caution,&#8221; Army sources had informed.</p>
<p>On July 7, a reduction of the PLA at the Pangong Tso Lake of eastern Ladakh took place. The sources had added that the disengagement in Patrolling Point 15 will finish by July 8 and that in Patrolling Point 17 Alpha in will finish in the next two days. In a bid to avoid accidental friction, patroling has been suspended in the disengaged area temporarily but both sides have not given up the right to patrol.</p>
<p>The Indian Army is also concerned that each step of disengagement process is easily reversible by Chinese PLA as long as they remain deployed in strength from Finger 4-8, which is around 8 km, patrolled by both India and China until now, along LAC.</p>
<p>In the last round of military talks held between the two-nation at Chushul sector on the Indian side of the LAC, India reiterated its demand for the pullback of Chinese troops from friction site along the LAC. According to sources, India had asked the Chinese side to return to pre-May 4 military positions along the LAC.</p>
<p><a href="https://zeenews.india.com/india/india-china-complete-disengagement-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-along-lac-in-ladakh-sources-2294636.html">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/india-china-disengage-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-indian-military-review/">India, China disengage at Gogra, Galwan and Hot Springs  &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/india-china-disengage-at-gogra-galwan-and-hot-springs-indian-military-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese troops vacate Hot Springs; pull back slow in other areas &#8211; Indian Military Review</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/__trashed-696/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/__trashed-696/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 18:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India China disengagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pangong Tso]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=5504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Indian and Chinese armies continued with the troop withdrawal process on Wednesday clearing patrol point-15 – another friction zone in eastern Ladakh that was on the knife-edge during the nine-week long stand-off in India’s northernmost union territory. The disengagement has been completed at PP-15 (Gogra Post/Hot Spring areas) where the troops have moved back by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/__trashed-696/">Chinese troops vacate Hot Springs; pull back slow in other areas &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indian and Chinese armies continued with the troop withdrawal process on Wednesday clearing patrol point-15 – another friction zone in eastern Ladakh that was on the knife-edge during the nine-week long stand-off in India’s northernmost union territory.</p>
<p>The disengagement has been completed at PP-15 (Gogra Post/Hot Spring areas) where the troops have moved back by nearly two km from the line of actual control, government sources said. At PP-17 and PP-17A in the same area, it would take another day or two to finish the task.<br />
PP-15 is the second friction point that was cleared by the two armies in the last two days after PP-14 that witnessed a bloody battle on June 15 between the troops leading to the death of 20 Indian soldiers and a significant number of Chinese troops. Satellite images also confirm the clearance.</p>
<p>On the northen banks of the Pangong Tso where the Chinese troops fortified their positions, sources said some more thinning of the People’s Liberation Army troops had taken place at Finger 4 up to which the Indian troops are restricted at the moment, but there is no sign of a definitive pull back yet.</p>
<p>Traditionally on the northern banks of the 135 km long lake, Indian troops used to patrol upto Finger 8, which is 8 km east of Finger 4.</p>
<p>Sources said the two armies were exploring yet another meeting of the senior military commanders to complete the verification process and decide on the future course of action. But no time schedule has been drawn yet.</p>
<p>The joint verification will assess the implementation of the disengagement process once the dismantling of temporary infrastructure and withdrawal of troops are completed. Besides the talks would also finalise the modalities for restoring normalcy and bringing back peace and tranquillity along the LAC after the disengagement exercise is completed.</p>
<p>At PP-14 and PP-15, a buffer zone has been created which no army is patrolling at the moment. Indian Army sources insist it was only a temporary measure necessary to avoid recurrence of any inadvertent clash between the troops.</p>
<p>“This is only a temporary step which would be in place till the disengagement process is complete. No permanent buffer zone has been created,” said an Army officer.</p>
<p>Sources said Indian Army would maintain its aggressive posturing along the LAC till the Chinese side cuts down on its significant build up in the depth areas on their side of the LAC.</p>
<p>Both sides brought in thousands of additional troops and weaponry including tanks and artillery guns to their rear bases as part of a build up following the face-off that began on May 5, even though increased Chinese presence along the LAC was noticed by mid-April.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/withdrawal-of-chinese-troops-in-hot-springs-complete-pull-back-continues-in-other-areas-858622.html">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/__trashed-696/">Chinese troops vacate Hot Springs; pull back slow in other areas &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/__trashed-696/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
