<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>India-Bhutan | IMR</title>
	<atom:link href="https://imrmedia.in/tag/india-bhutan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://imrmedia.in/tag/india-bhutan/</link>
	<description>Indian Military Review, Defense News, Indian Defence Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 06:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bhutan does a U-turn on boundary dispute with China; India alarmed</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/bhutan-does-a-u-turn-on-boundary-dispute-with-china-india-alarmed/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/bhutan-does-a-u-turn-on-boundary-dispute-with-china-india-alarmed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhutan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhutan-China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doklam border dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doklam face-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doklam plateau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galwan Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Bhutan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jhampheri ridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siliguri Corridor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=16010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bhutan Prime Minister&#160;Lotay Tshering&#160;has caused deep concern&#160;with his recent interview&#160;with&#160;a Belgian daily, in which he gave China equal weightage among Delhi, Thimphu, and Beijing in settling the&#160;Doklam border&#160;dispute. “It is not up to Bhutan alone to solve the problem,” Tshering told&#160;Le Libre, referring to the Doklam plateau where there was a face-off between Chinese and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/bhutan-does-a-u-turn-on-boundary-dispute-with-china-india-alarmed/">Bhutan does a U-turn on boundary dispute with China; India alarmed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bhutan Prime Minister&nbsp;Lotay Tshering&nbsp;has caused deep concern&nbsp;with his recent interview&nbsp;with&nbsp;a Belgian daily, in which he gave China equal weightage among Delhi, Thimphu, and Beijing in settling the&nbsp;Doklam border&nbsp;dispute.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It is not up to Bhutan alone to solve the problem,” Tshering told&nbsp;Le Libre, referring to the Doklam plateau where there was a face-off between Chinese and Indian troops in 2017 that lasted more than two months&nbsp;until&nbsp;Beijing&nbsp;agreed to withdraw&nbsp;personnel&nbsp;from the eyeball-to-eyeball situation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There are three of us. There is no big or small country, there are three equal countries, each counting for a third,” Tshering&nbsp;added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His&nbsp;remarks give the impression that the Bhutanese government, as well as its able monarch, are fast arriving at the conclusion that they must resolve their disputed boundary with the huge economic power sooner than later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The situation is exacerbated by the fact that&nbsp;in June 2020,&nbsp;China&nbsp;laid claim&nbsp;to the Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary in eastern Bhutan. China has also built several villages, allegedly inside Bhutanese territory, but Tshering dismissed the claims in the interview.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Bhutanese PM’s remarks come in the run-up to the&nbsp;third&nbsp;anniversary of the stand-off between India and China in eastern Ladakh.&nbsp;All this time,&nbsp;17 rounds of talks&nbsp;have taken place to maintain stability in the area after the unfortunate incident in the Galwan Valley, in which both Indian and Chinese soldiers lost their lives.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Keeping a close watch</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For India, Tshering’s remarks are significant. If Tshering is now saying that China has an equal right in the resolution of the&nbsp;Doklam&nbsp;dispute, then it is sure to change perceptions all around.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Remember that in the summer of 2017, Indian troops moved into the Doklam plateau to prevent the Chinese from extending a road it was constructing toward an adjoining hill feature called the Jhampheri ridge. If the Chinese had been able to build their road, they would have been within kissing distance of&nbsp;Chicken’s&nbsp;Neck — the Siliguri Corridor —&nbsp;that&nbsp;connects the Northeast and the Indian mainland.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the situation in eastern Ladakh having flared up in the last two years, certainly, the Bhutanese next door are closely watching. Even they would have realised that it is not easy for India to deal with China’s rising power and that Beijing, especially after Xi Jinping’s recent consolidation as the supreme leader, is not ready to give an inch to its pesky neighbours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In fact, with Russia ready to become an able partner in the evolving geopolitical sweepstakes against the&nbsp;United States&nbsp;— the Ukraine conflict&nbsp;being&nbsp;the touchstone — China probably feels&nbsp;that&nbsp;this is the right time to ram through a resolution of its remaining two border disputes.&nbsp;China shares its&nbsp;borders with 14 countries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Surely, the Bhutanese would have thought that if&nbsp;Delhi, which is a serious rival to China, still hasn’t been able to resolve its dispute with&nbsp;Beijing, what chance did Thimphu have?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reviving the 1992 agreement?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the interview with the Belgian daily, Tshering also gave an interesting deadline for the resolution of the dispute with Beijing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are not experiencing major border problems with China, but some territories have not yet been demarcated. After one or two more meetings, we will probably be able to draw a dividing line,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It seems that the Bhutanese government is considering a return to the 1992 agreement with Beijing, in which, according to reliable sources, it agreed to resolve the disputed borders in the Doklam region in exchange for territories in the north. It&nbsp;also appears&nbsp;that the northern lands also include some grazing&nbsp;areas that&nbsp;belong to the&nbsp;Bhutanese&nbsp;king.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the last few decades, the Bhutanese king and&nbsp;his&nbsp;elected government have been able to fend off a resolution, probably keeping in mind Delhi’s sensitivities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the India-China dispute remaining unresolved, and, in fact, becoming more implacable — to the extent that the Chinese have actually attempted incursions, especially in eastern Ladakh — Delhi would have advised Thimphu to ‘go slow’ with Beijing, in the hope that it could come to some sort of face-saving agreement with China.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But Tshering’s interview clearly indicates that the Chinese are losing patience with Bhutan. We know that they are pressing for the 25th&nbsp;round of border talks with Thimphu, and that in January this year, the Bhutanese and the Chinese held a meeting in the southern Chinese city of Kunming where they discussed a&nbsp;“three-step roadmap”&nbsp;to settle the border dispute.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also know that the very close relationship between India and Bhutan implies that&nbsp;the latter&nbsp;is&nbsp;keeping Delhi fully briefed on the evolving talks between&nbsp;Beijing&nbsp;and&nbsp;Thimphu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lotay Tshering’s public remarks have cast a ripple in the still waters. Certainly, they will have an impact on how India looks at its northern neighbourhood.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/bhutan-does-a-u-turn-on-boundary-dispute-with-china-india-alarmed/">Bhutan does a U-turn on boundary dispute with China; India alarmed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/bhutan-does-a-u-turn-on-boundary-dispute-with-china-india-alarmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s new boundary dispute with Bhutan targets India &#8211; Indian Military Review</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/chinas-new-boundary-dispute-with-bhutan-targets-india-indian-military-review/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/chinas-new-boundary-dispute-with-bhutan-targets-india-indian-military-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMR Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Defence News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese claims on Bhutan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Bhutan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Tibet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=5342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese government’s decision for the first time to publicly put on record that it has a boundary dispute with Bhutan in the eastern sector is a calibrated manner of launching a diplomatic attack on Thimphu’s ally India on a new front. The key could be the proximity of Bhutan’s “eastern sector” to Arunachal Pradesh [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/chinas-new-boundary-dispute-with-bhutan-targets-india-indian-military-review/">China’s new boundary dispute with Bhutan targets India &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese government’s decision for the first time to publicly put on record that it has a boundary dispute with Bhutan in the eastern sector is a calibrated manner of launching a diplomatic attack on Thimphu’s ally India on a new front.</p>
<p>The key could be the proximity of Bhutan’s “eastern sector” to Arunachal Pradesh – which China claims in its entirety as part of “south Tibet” : It could be the primary reason for Beijing to talk about differing boundary perceptions with Bhutan now.</p>
<p>First at a multilateral environment forum in June, where India was present, and then through a statement to HT, the Chinese foreign ministry has said it has a border dispute with Bhutan in the eastern sector, surprising many who are following developments in the region.</p>
<p>Besides multiplying pressure on New Delhi during the ongoing, and most serious border tension with India in decades, it is also a ploy by China to simultaneously internationalise an issue it has seldom done before – the boundary problem with its tiny neighbour.</p>
<p>Though China might not have said it publicly, it’s not surprising if Beijing was opposed to the India-Bhutan boundary delimitation agreement, which was signed in 2006 &#8212; more so because of Bhutan’s borders with Arunachal Pradesh.</p>
<p>The Chinese foreign ministry, in a statement issued to Hindustan Times last week, said the China-Bhutan boundary has never been delimited and there “have been disputes over the eastern, central and western sections for a long time”. The statement in Mandarin further said “a third party should not point fingers” in the China-Bhutan border issue – an apparent reference to India.</p>
<p>Referring to Chinese foreign ministry’s statement saying the disputes in the three areas have been there “for a long time”, Constantino Xavier, fellow in foreign policy studies at the think-tank Brookings India, said the timing chosen by Beijing to raise the issue – amid the ongoing Sino-India border tension &#8212; was important.</p>
<p>“Even while this Chinese claim may not be new, the timing and the multilateral setting of Beijing’s statement reflect intent to put pressure on Bhutan and India, seeking to create a wedge between both countries,” Xavier said.</p>
<p>“You got to see the Chinese claims in continuation to their strategy of territorial claims elsewhere,” a New Delhi-based Asia expert said on condition of anonymity.</p>
<p>China’s state-controlled media and Chinese academics consistently blame India for Beijing-Thimphu not having diplomatic ties.</p>
<p>“As far as I know, the China-Bhutan boundary issue was almost resolved 20 years ago. The two sides have a common understanding on how to sign the final agreement. But for Bhutan, it is difficult because of the India factor. That is the same reason why China and Bhutan have not signed the agreement,” Lin Minwang, assistant dean at the Institute of International Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University, said.</p>
<p>“But using Bhutan to target India may turn out to be counterproductive for China: it will lose political capital in Bhutan and is actually facilitating closer diplomatic coordination between Thimphu and Delhi.”</p>
<p>In 2018 July, vice foreign minister Kong Xuanyou led a rare high-level visit from China to Bhutan; he was accompanied by Luo Zhaohui, the then Chinese envoy to India.</p>
<p>The Chinese foreign ministry statement released at the end of his visit said: “China highly values its traditional friendly relations with Bhutan, and will as always respect Bhutan’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, respect the political system and development path chosen by Bhutan based on its own national conditions, and respect the independent foreign policy of peace upheld by Bhutan.”</p>
<p><a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/china-s-bhutan-move-aimed-at-india/story-JS0A3gx4FQVlwSrZ4NPfgI.html#:~:text=The%20Chinese%20government's%20decision%20for,India%20on%20a%20new%20front.">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/chinas-new-boundary-dispute-with-bhutan-targets-india-indian-military-review/">China’s new boundary dispute with Bhutan targets India &#8211; Indian Military Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/chinas-new-boundary-dispute-with-bhutan-targets-india-indian-military-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
