<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nathu la | IMR</title>
	<atom:link href="https://imrmedia.in/tag/nathu-la/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://imrmedia.in/tag/nathu-la/</link>
	<description>Indian Military Review, Defense News, Indian Defence Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Book Review: China Betrays Again</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/book-review-china-betrays-again/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/book-review-china-betrays-again/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gen Ravi Arora]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbourhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cho la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doklam Stand-Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galwan clash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nathu la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samdurong Chu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=17111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>China had backstabbed India in 1962 despite unprecedented support provided by India to China for its legitimacy, Panchsheel agreement and Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai being at the centre stage of our relationship. While India gave a befitting reply in 1967 (Nathu La- Chola Clashes), 1987 (Samdurong Chu mobilisation) and 2017 (Doklam Stand Off) but China has continued [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/book-review-china-betrays-again/">Book Review: China Betrays Again</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China had backstabbed India in 1962 despite unprecedented support provided by India to China for its legitimacy, Panchsheel agreement and Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai being at the centre stage of our relationship. While India gave a befitting reply in 1967 (Nathu La- Chola Clashes), 1987 (Samdurong Chu mobilisation) and 2017 (Doklam Stand Off) but China has continued with its hidden agenda of betrayal and expansionism since its inception.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China has been taking advantage of huge Indian market to enhance its economic strength in the garb of peace and tranquillity but it has been working quietly and deliberately against the Indian national interests which became obvious in Apr-May 2020 wherein it carried out large scale transgressions in Eastern Ladakh which are still continuing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sacrifices by CO and 19-unit personnel during the Galwan clash are a watershed moment for Indian Defence Forces wherein the Chinese have betrayed India ‘once again’. This necessitates that the Indian masses understand the Chinese behavioural pattern as that has not emerged ‘overnight’. It is towards this that the book ‘China Betrays Again’ written by Maj Gen (Dr) Ashok Kumar, VSM (Retd) fills this gap to assist the readers to comprehend the multiple dynamics of Chinese expansionist agenda and as to why it behaves the way it behaves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ALSO READ: <a href="https://imrmedia.in/china-fuelling-an-asian-nato/">China Fuelling An Asian NATO?</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Book also throws light on Galwan clash, multiple rounds of Corps commander level discussions, infrastructure development and implications for India &amp; China due to continuing Stand Off. It also highlights as to how the Chinese have converted the ‘territorial issue’ into a ‘sovereignty issue’ by adopting its Land Boundary Law effective from 1 Jan 2022.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China is also aggressively changing/ bringing in new sovereignty markers by extended infrastructure development and establishment of the model villages all along the LAC which have to be actively responded by India with enhanced focus on the ‘vibrant villages.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The author has taken pains to elaborate the developments in China since 1911 including conflicts between ROC and PRC. The expansionist agenda and its physical manifestation has also been comprehensively covered. This will help in crystal gazing in its future behaviour.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The details of border disputes and LAC disputes have been comprehensively covered in the simplest language for reader to understand. The book also helps to understand the Chinese design of debt trapping in the other countries with specific details of Sri Lanka.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ALSO READ: <a href="https://imrmedia.in/fujian-chinas-newest-type-03-aircraft-carrier/">Fujian – China’s Newest Type 03 Aircraft Carrier</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The book also looks at multiple other issues connected with China whether it is BRI or CPEC. Chinese collusivity with Pakistan and its impact on the resolution of the Siachen glacier has also been comprehensively covered.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reader will be able to get a clear sense of the Chinese activities in South China Sea as well as East China Sea besides its efforts to affect the freedom of navigation for the other countries. Its ambitions to integrate Taiwan have also been covered in detail. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><br>Prof Hoppymon Jacob has written the ‘Foreword’ of the book which comprehensively captures the essence of the content. The book has been published by ‘Sabre and Quill’ publishers containing 283 pages with cost of Rs 1295/- for hardcover edition. The book is available at Amazon, Sabre &amp; Quill publishers and Book Mart distributors. Author signed copies can be obtained directly from the author.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/book-review-china-betrays-again/">Book Review: China Betrays Again</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/book-review-china-betrays-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Nathu La Skirmish, 1967</title>
		<link>https://imrmedia.in/the-nathu-la-skirmish-1967/</link>
					<comments>https://imrmedia.in/the-nathu-la-skirmish-1967/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cover Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbourhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indo-china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nathu la]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://imrmedia.in/?p=1913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>During the 1965 War between India and Pakistan, China served an ultimatum demanding that India withdraw her posts from Nathu La and Jelep La in Sikkim. In the 17 Mountain Division sector, the main defences were at Changgu, while Nathula was only an observation post. In case of hostilities, the division commanders had been given [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/the-nathu-la-skirmish-1967/">The Nathu La Skirmish, 1967</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the 1965 War between India and Pakistan, China served an ultimatum demanding that India withdraw her posts from Nathu La and Jelep La in Sikkim. In the 17 Mountain Division sector, the main defences were at Changgu, while Nathula was only an observation post. In case of hostilities, the division commanders had been given the authority to vacate the posts and fall back on the main defences. Maj Gen Sagat Singh, GOC 17 Division, did not agree with the views of the Corps HQ. Vacating the passes would give the Chinese the tactical advantage of observation and fire into India, while denying the same to our own troops.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the event, 27 Division vacated Jelep La, which the Chinese promptly occupied. However, Nathu La remained in Indian hands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the first week of August 1967, the border outposts (BOPs) at Nathu La were occupied by 2 Grenadiers, under Lt Col Rai Singh, relieving 18 Rajput. Maj Bishan Singh took over as &#8216;Tiger Nathu La&#8217;. The deployment at Nathu La comprised a platoon each on Camel&#8217;s Back, South Shoulder, Centre Bump and Sebu La. The battalion HQ was at GoleGhar, while the 3-inch mortars and administrative base were at Sherabthang.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On 13 August the observation post at Sebu La reported that the Chinese had arrived on the crest line and dug trenches on our side of the IB. When challenged, they filled up the trenches and withdrew. 2 Grenadiers was ordered to lay a three-strand wire fence along the border from Nathu La towards the North Shoulder. However, as soon as work began on the fence on 20 August, the Chinese became agitated and asked the Indians to stop.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On 23 August, Major Bishan Singh reported that about 75 Chinese in battle dress carrying rifles fitted with bayonets were advancing towards Nathu La. They started shouting slogans. Indian troops were &#8216;standing to&#8217;, watching and waiting. After standing on the border for about an hour the Chinese withdrew and all was quiet again.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fron 2 to 7 September, efforts were made to contruct the bard wire fence and objected by the Chinese every time. At one time Major Bishan and his men were detained but they pushed their way through the Chinese and returned to Nathu La.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On 7 September work started again on laying the wire and it resulted in hand-to-hand fighting and the Chinese pelting stones. The Grenadiers responded in the same manner. On 10 September, Sagat held a conference at the Brigade HQ in Changgu, where he personally briefed everyone on how the operation for constructing the fence was to be carried out next morning. One company of 18 Rajput was brought in to reinforce the defences. An ad hoc force of 90 men was organised into a protection party to charge the Chinese positions if they opened fire. A pioneer platoon was to assist the platoon of 70 Field Company, to lay the wire.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As soon as work commenced on 11 September, the Chinese came up to the fence and tried to stop it. As the arguments became more heated, tempers rose, with both sides standing their ground. Suddenly, the Chinese opened fire, causing several casualties among the troops working on the wire fence. Lt Col Rai Singh was hit by a Chinese bullet and fell down.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Seeing their CO fall, the Grenadiers became mad with rage. In a fit of fury, they came out of their trenches and attacked the Chinese post, led by Capt PS Dagar. The company of 18 Rajput, under Maj Harbhajan Singh and the sappers and pioneers working on the fence had been caught in the open and suffered heavy casualties from the Chinese firing. Realising that the only way to neutralise the Chinese fire was a physical assault, Harbhajan led a charge on the Chinese position. Several of the Indian troops were mowed down by Chinese machine guns, but those who reached the Chinese bunkers used their bayonets and accounted for many of the enemy. Both Harbhajan and Dagar lost their lives in the action, which developed into a full scale battle, lasting six days. Sagat had asked for some medium guns and these were moved up to Kyangnosala, at a height of over 10,000 ft. The artillery OPs proved their worth in bringing down effective fire on the Chinese. Because of lack of observation and the steep incline west of Nathula, most Chinese shells fell behind the forward defences and did not harm the Indians.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The skirmish at Nathula lasted six days. The Indian casualties in the action were just over two hundred &#8211; 65 dead and 145 wounded. The Chinese are estimated to have suffered about 300 casualties.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://imrmedia.in/the-nathu-la-skirmish-1967/">The Nathu La Skirmish, 1967</a> appeared first on <a href="https://imrmedia.in">IMR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://imrmedia.in/the-nathu-la-skirmish-1967/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
