Advertisement

Taliban Declares “Come and Get It”

US President Donald Trump articulated multiple assertions regarding Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, notably underscoring its strategic significance, following his inauguration as the 47th president.

At its zenith under U.S. administration, Bagram Air Base accommodated roughly 10,000 military personnel. This encompassed personnel from the U.S. Armed troops and allied troops. The base underwent significant modernization during this period, incorporating two runways, numerous hangars, residential facilities, and a hospital equipped with advanced medical capabilities. It served as a crucial center for military operations in Afghanistan, significantly contributing to logistics, air support, and information collection.

Advertisement

Trump’s Statements Regarding Bagram

Trump consistently emphasized Bagram’s nearness to areas in China where nuclear armaments are produced. He contended that the U.S. ought to have maintained control of the base, not for Afghanistan, but to mitigate China’s influence.

He condemned the Biden administration for relinquishing Bagram during the U.S. pullout from Afghanistan in 2021. Trump asserted that this move enabled China to increase its influence in the region, despite the Taliban’s denial of any Chinese presence at the base.

Trump criticized the management of U.S. military equipment abandoned after the pullout, characterizing it as a substantial loss. He proposed that the U.S. ought to retrieve this equipment.

These assertions have ignited discussions over the practicality and consequences of reclaiming Bagram. Simultaneously, the Taliban’s formal reaction to Trump appears to be, “Approach and seize it if you are able.”

Essential Aspects of Bagram

Constructed by the Soviet Union in the 1950s amid the Cold War, Bagram became as a significant facility after the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan. Following the Soviet retreat and the dissolution of the USSR, the United States assumed control of Bagram in 2001, targeting Osama bin Laden and dismantling the Taliban regime.

Bagram, referred to as “Afghanistan’s Guantanamo,” contained a CIA holding facility for the interrogation of Al-Qaeda suspects.

In 2020, Trump brokered a troop pullout agreement with the Taliban, which included provisions for retaining control of Bagram. The Biden administration withdrew US soldiers. In 2021, the Taliban swiftly reasserted dominance over Afghanistan and Bagram.

Chronicle of Bagram Air Base

Located in Parwan Province, Afghanistan, Bagram was originally built by the Soviet Union in the 1950s during the Cold War. Bagram functioned as a significant military installation for the Soviets during their incursion into Afghanistan in the 1980s. Subsequent to the Soviet withdrawal, the base was utilized by multiple Afghan forces throughout the civil war of the 1990s.

Subsequent to the U.S.-led incursion into Afghanistan in 2001, Bagram emerged as the preeminent U.S. military installation in the nation. It functioned as a pivotal center for operations targeting the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The base underwent modernization and expansion, incorporating two runways, hangars, residential facilities, and a hospital.

ALSO READ: Troubles Mounting for Xi Inside China

In August 2021, when U.S. and NATO forces exited Afghanistan, the base was transferred to the Afghan National Army. Subsequently, it was seized by the Taliban upon their acquisition of power over the country.

Viability of Reacquiring Bagram

Experts have articulated divergent views regarding former U.S. President Donald Trump’s statements on reclaiming Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Trump contended that the station holds strategic significance, not only for Afghanistan but also for combating China’s influence, given its proximity to areas where China advances its nuclear weapons.

Analysts have expressed apprehensions over the viability of such an action. They indicate that the base is presently under Taliban control, which has refuted any Chinese involvement in the area. Moreover, specialists underscore the logistical and diplomatic obstacles associated with reinstating a U.S. presence at Bagram, particularly in light of the intricacies of the U.S.-Taliban relationship and the wider geopolitical ramifications.

The discussion highlights the overarching issue of how the U.S. ought to interact with Afghanistan and its neighboring countries in the post-withdrawal period.

Experts contend that reclaiming Bargam would necessitate considerable resources and might heighten tensions with both China and the Taliban. The Taliban, although refuting Trump’s assertions, have affirmed their influence over the base and characterized his words as “emotional” and rooted on ignorance.

Given the logistical problems and the possibility for huge military and financial expenditures, reclaiming Bagram is likely to result in a massive military operation in which US forces would get entangled in extended combat.